Genealogy News · Source Interpretation · Published 2026-10-08

Surname-Origin Narratives and Genealogical Clues in the Preface to the Andong Gwon Clan Genealogy

The Andong Gwon clan takes Andong as its bon-gwan, or ancestral seat. The genealogical preface regards the granting of a surname to 权幸 as the beginning of the clan and records its early generations, two major branches, and the process of compiling and revising the genealogy. The relevant material should be cross-checked against official histories, local gazetteers, and different genealogical editions, while noting that the Andong Gwon clan is not a branch of the Chinese An surname clan.

In the Andong Gwon clan, “Andong” is generally a regional name indicating the bon-gwan, or ancestral seat, while “Gwon” is the surname. Therefore, the mere appearance of the character “An” in the name does not justify classifying the clan as part of the Chinese An surname. ZongMai surname materials record several explanations for the origins of the An surname; commonly cited commanderies of origin include Wuling, Guzang, and Henei, while historical distribution clues involve Henan, Hebei, Gansu, Shandong, Shanxi, and other areas. The two surnames have different backgrounds of formation and genealogical traditions and should be examined separately. Even when surnames are identical, shared ancestry cannot be assumed without evidence.

According to the accounts in extant genealogical prefaces, the Andong Gwon clan regards 金幸 from the late Silla period as the founding ancestor through whom the surname was acquired. The genealogy states that he served as magistrate of Gochang County, submitted to Wang Geon amid the political transition from Silla to Goryeo, and was granted the Gwon surname for his achievements; Gochang was later elevated to Andong Prefecture. This origin narrative is an important part of the Andong Gwon clan’s genealogical identity. However, genealogical prefaces also serve to trace origins and praise ancestral virtue. The official titles, enfeoffments, reasons for the granting of the surname, and related events still require item-by-item verification against Goryeo-period historical records, biographies, and local documents.

The preface also lists several generations following 权幸, including, in sequence, 仁幸, 册, 均汉, 子彭, 先盖, 廉, 利舆, and 仲时, and states that 仲时’s sons 守平 and 守洪 each had descendants who flourished. It subsequently records 权韪 and 权溥, along with 权溥’s sons, in the line of 守平, and also mentions distinguished descendants among the descendants of 守洪, summarizing them as two major clan branches. Such an early, continuous sequence of generations provides important clues for studying branch divisions, marriages, and relationships among historical figures. However, a single genealogical preface is not sufficient to confirm that every generational link is accurate; differences in variant characters, missing characters, official titles, and generational numbering across editions require particular scrutiny.

Regarding the compilation and revision of the genealogy, the preface reflects a process in which clan members first collected small genealogical records, after which several people continued the search, filled omissions, identified errors, and ultimately organized the material into genealogical charts and had it printed. The preface also explains that records of earlier generations were scarce, so the compilers recorded only what could be ascertained at the time and did not fill in what was unknowable. This approach reminds later researchers that genealogies preserve family memory but are also shaped by the loss of materials, errors in copying and transmission, and ideas about genealogical compilation. When using them, researchers should distinguish between original records, later retrospective accounts, and normative or moralizing passages.

For further ancestry research, one may first establish relationships among individuals, spouses, generations, and branches in an online genealogy, then compare the place names found in the preface with administrative changes, official rosters, and biographical gazetteers in local-history databases. Privately held genealogy pages, epitaphs, commemorative texts, household-register materials, and family memoirs can also supplement information on migration, branch divisions, and transmission in modern and contemporary times. When entering data, it is advisable to retain the original text, edition, page number, and provenance, and to label ancestor relationships that have not yet been cross-checked as legends, genealogical claims, or pending verification, thereby avoiding erroneous connections based solely on identical names, surnames, or bon-gwan.

Record your family’s stories on ZongMai Genealogy →